CAFF 2017: State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report: Key Findings and advice for monitoring
SAMBR: Key Findings and advice for monitoring
Geographical coverage
Geographical scale of the assessment | Regional |
---|---|
Country or countries covered | Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Russia, Iceland, Norway, United States, Faroe Islands |
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name |
Arctic; cirumpolar |
Geographical scale of the assessment
Regional
Country or countries covered
Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Russia, Iceland, Norway, United States, Faroe Islands
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name
Arctic; cirumpolar
Conceptual framework, methodology and scope
Assessment objectives
This State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report (SAMBR) is the first integrated reporting outcome from the CBMP Marine Plan.
Where it has been possible, the SAMBR: • describes current and/or historical baseline status of identified FECs; • evaluates historical and contemporary trends; • considers how changes in biodiversity may be linked to stressors; • describes differences that have occurred within the Arctic Marine Areas (AMAs); • describes status of Arctic biodiversity monitoring; • identifies research priorities, knowledge gaps; and • provides advice for monitoring and management.
The Arctic Biodiversity Assessment (ABA) (Meltofte 2013) provides the fundamental baseline to make trend assessments in SAMBR possible. Six Marine Expert Networks (Sea ice biota, Plankton, Benthos, Fishes, Seabirds and Marine mammals) provide the framework to implement the CBMP Marine Plan and generate the information required for SAMBR.
Mandate for the assessment
The Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP) is working with partners across the Arctic to harmonize and enhance long-term marine monitoring efforts. These efforts are led by a Marine Steering Group with expertise from six Marine Expert Networks.
In April 2011, these scientists and community experts released the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Plan, an agreement between six Arctic coastal nations and many national, regional, Indigenous and academic organizations on how to monitor Arctic marine ecosystems. The Plan has been endorsed by Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council.
Implementation is underway. This coordinated approach will facilitate more powerful and cost-effective assessments through the generation of, and access to, improved circumpolar datasets.
The State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report (SAMBR) is the first assessment derived from the implementation of the Circumpolar Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Plan.
Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment
Other (please specify)
Arctic Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Plan is the first of four pan-Arctic biodiveristy monitoring plans developed by the CBMP to improve the ability to detect and understand the causes of long-term change in the composition, structure and function of Arctic ecosystems. This "umbrella" plan for monitoring the Arctic marine environment works with existing monitoring capacity to facilitate improved and cost-effective monitoring through enhanced integration and coordination. This will allow for earlier detection of trends and more effective policy and management response.
URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted
State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report: https://arcticbiodiversity.is/marine Arctic Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Plan: https://www.caff.is/marine/marine-monitoring-plan
System(s) assessed
- Marine
Species groups assessed
Sea Ice Biota, Plankton, Seabirds, Benthos, Fishes, Marine mammals
Ecosystem services/functions assessed
Provisioning
Regulating
Supporting Services/Functions
Cultural Services
Scope of assessment includes
Drivers of change in systems and services
Yes
Impacts of change in services on human well-being
No
Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed
Yes
Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment
Yes
Timing of the assessment
Year assessment started
2015
Year assessment finished
2017
If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish
Periodicity of assessment
Repeated
If repeated, how frequently
4 year intervals
Assessment outputs
Website(s)
Report(s)
Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)
https://youtu.be/Fk3dW7eqACE
Journal publications
Training materials
Other documents/outputs
Data and graphics: http://geo.abds.is/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/search?resultType=details&fast=index&_content_type=json&from=1&to=20&sortBy=relevance&_cat=SAMBR
Tools and processes
Tools and approaches used in the assessment
- Modelling
- Geospatial analysis
- Indicators
Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component
Multi-stakeholder engagement through workshops; communication; conferences etc
Key stakeholder groups engaged
Scientists, Indigenous peoples, NGOs, policy and decision makers tec
The number of people directly involved in the assessment process
10-100
Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge
Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment
Assessment reports peer reviewed
Yes
Data
Accessibility of data used in assessment
This report and associated materials, data and graphics can be downloaded for free at: www.arcticbiodiversity.is/marine
Policy impact
Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions
A summary report for policy makers providing key findings and advice for monitoring was delivered to a meeting of the foreign Ministers of the Arctic states in May 2017. The ministerial declaration from this meeting welcomed the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program’s State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report as the first of its kind, welcomed the summary report, and encourage further efforts to address monitoring needs and to develop biodiversity status reports for other Arctic ecosystems. Work is now underway to follow-up on the findings of the report.
Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment
No
Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews
Capacity building
Capacity building needs identified during the assessment
Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity
Network and sharing experiences, Access to funding, Sharing of data/repatriation of data, Workshops, Developing/promoting and providing access to support tools, Communication and awareness raising