CAFF 2013: Life Linked to Ice: a guide to sea-ice-associated biodiversity in this time of rapid change
Life linked to ice
Geographical coverage
Geographical scale of the assessment | Regional |
---|---|
Country or countries covered | Denmark, Greenland, Russia, Iceland, Norway, United States, Faroe Islands |
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name |
Geographical scale of the assessment
Regional
Country or countries covered
Denmark, Greenland, Russia, Iceland, Norway, United States, Faroe Islands
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name
Conceptual framework, methodology and scope
Assessment objectives
The Life Linked to Ice: a guide to sea-ice-associated biodiversity in this time of rapid change details changes in marine species and human communities as Arctic sea ice disappears and making recommendations to the Arctic Council. The report: - discusses the expected reaction of species to lower occurrences of ice, - reflects on the effects low ice and its impact on species biodiversity to northern peoples, and - makes recommendations that might mitigate these changes.
Mandate for the assessment
An assessment conducted by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), the biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council and consists of National Representatives assigned by each of the eight Arctic Council Member States, representatives of Indigenous Peoples' organizations that are Permanent Participants to the Council, and Arctic Council observer countries and organizations. The CAFF Working Group operates by the Arctic Council Rules of Procedures.
CAFF serves as a vehicle to cooperate on species and habitat management and utilization, to share information on management techniques and regulatory regimes, and to facilitate more knowledgeable decision-making. It provides a mechanism to develop common responses on issues of importance for the Arctic ecosystem such as development and economic pressures, conservation opportunities and political commitments.
Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment
URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted
http://www.caff.is/sea-ice-associated-biodiversity
System(s) assessed
- Marine
Species groups assessed
Sea ice associated biodiversity
Ecosystem services/functions assessed
Provisioning
- Water
Regulating
Supporting Services/Functions
- Habitat maintenance
Cultural Services
Scope of assessment includes
Drivers of change in systems and services
No
Impacts of change in services on human well-being
No
Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed
No
Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment
No
Timing of the assessment
Year assessment started
2012
Year assessment finished
2013
If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish
Periodicity of assessment
Unknown
Assessment outputs
Report(s)
http://www.caff.is/sea-ice-associated-biodiversity/sea-ice-publications
Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)
Journal publications
Training materials
Other documents/outputs
Tools and processes
Tools and approaches used in the assessment
- Modelling
- Geospatial analysis
- Indicators
- Scenarios
Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component
CAFF is the biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council and consists of National Representatives assigned by each of the eight Arctic Council Member States, representatives of Indigenous Peoples' organizations that are Permanent Participants to the Council, and Arctic Council observer countries and organizations. The CAFF Working Group operates by the Arctic Council Rules of Procedures. All Arctic states, indigenous organisations (members of the Arctic Council) and a range of Arctic Council observers engaged in the ABA process via the CAFF working group
CAFF serves as a vehicle to cooperate on species and habitat management and utilization, to share information on management techniques and regulatory regimes, and to facilitate more knowledgeable decision-making. It provides a mechanism to develop common responses on issues of importance for the Arctic ecosystem such as development and economic pressures, conservation opportunities and political commitments.
Key stakeholder groups engaged
Policy-makers, government officials, indigenous peoples, students and industry and civil society representatives
The number of people directly involved in the assessment process
10-100
Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge
- Scientific information only
- Resource experts (e.g. foresters etc)
- Traditional/local knowledge
Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment
Assessment reports peer reviewed
Yes
Data
Accessibility of data used in assessment
Data from the Assessment is being made available on the Arctic Biodiversity Data Service: www.abds.is
Policy impact
Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions
The Life linked to ice report was an early implementation action following up on recommendations from the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment (www.arcticbiodiversity.is). Four recommendations to Arctic Council and its participants emerged from this report: 1. Facilitate a move to more flexible, adaptable wildlife and habitat management and marine spatial planning approaches that respond effectively to rapid changes in Arctic biodiversity. 2. Identify measures for detecting early warnings of biodiversity change and triggering conservation actions. 3. Make more effective use of local and traditional knowledge in Arctic Council assessments and, more broadly, in ecological management. 4. Target resource managers when communicating research, monitoring and assessment findings. CAFF has now produced the Actions for Arctic biodiversity 2013-2021 and this report to be presented to the Arctic Council Magisterial in April 2015 contains actions to guide follow-up on these reports
Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment
No
Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews
Capacity building
Capacity building needs identified during the assessment
Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity
Network and sharing experiences, Access to funding, Sharing of data/repatriation of data, Workshops, Communication and awareness raising