Key Biodiversity Areas
KBAs
Geographical coverage
Geographical scale of the assessment | Global |
---|---|
Country or countries covered | |
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name |
Many existing methodologies can be included under the "Key Biodiversity Areas" umbrella. This includes Birdlife's Important Bird Areas (IBAs), Alliance for Zero Extinction sites (AZEs), and others which have been identified in numerous countries to date. |
Geographical scale of the assessment
Global
Country or countries covered
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name
Many existing methodologies can be included under the "Key Biodiversity Areas" umbrella. This includes Birdlife's Important Bird Areas (IBAs), Alliance for Zero Extinction sites (AZEs), and others which have been identified in numerous countries to date.
Conceptual framework, methodology and scope
Assessment objectives
The Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) methodology main objective is to identify sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity, identified through a set of clearly defined and easy to apply criteria and thresholds.
Mandate for the assessment
IUCN members, which include conservation organizations, academia, and governments, requested IUCN to convene a worldwide consultative process to agree a methodology to enable countries to identify Key Biodiversity Areas, drawing on data from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and other datasets, building on existing approaches (RESWCC3.013). This task was renewed through adopted resolution WCC-2012-Res-036. at the 2012 World Conservation Congress in Jeju, South Korea.
Key Biodiversity Areas are also one of the six priority IUCN Knowledge Products as identified in the 2013-2016 IUCN Programme which was adopted by IUCN members in the 2012 World Conservation Congress, and is available here:
Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment
Other (please specify)
Over the last three decades, various programmes to identify specific sites of global significance for biodiversity have been developed. These inventories, called Key biodiversity Areas (KBAs), have informed the selection of sites for protection under national and international legislation, are considered in international sustainability performance standards, and are included under multi-lateral environmental agreements. While the identification of KBAs to date has delivered substantial benefits, it is neither complete nor unified in assessment criteria. This has resulted in some confusion among decision-makers as well as duplication of efforts. IUCN is leading a global consultation process involving stakeholders within and beyond the conservation community and building on existing work, to develop a globally agreed standard on KBAs. The consultation is led by the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas and Species Survival Commission Joint Task Force on Biodiversity and Protected Areas, which activities for 2012- 2014 include: i) organizing of regional consultations in relevant regional fora; ii) convening technical working groups and reviews to address main issues identified through the process; and iii) publishing a set of guidelines, methods and recommendations that national constituencies can follow to identify KBAs in their respective regions or countries; iv) developing an online spatial tool and a consolidated KBA data system building. The final goal of this process is to provide an objective, scientifically rigorous methodology that is easy to apply, to identify KBAs across taxonomic groups and terrestrial, freshwater, and marine biomes.
URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted
System(s) assessed
- Marine
- Coastal
- Island
- Inland water
- Forest and woodland
- Cultivated/Agricultural land
- Grassland
- Mountain
- Dryland
- Polar
- Urban
Species groups assessed
Birds, Plants, Mammals,Freshwater Fish, Freshwater Molluscs, Freshwater Dragonflies and Damselflies,Freshwater Crabs, Butterflies
Ecosystem services/functions assessed
Provisioning
Regulating
Supporting Services/Functions
Cultural Services
Scope of assessment includes
Drivers of change in systems and services
No
Impacts of change in services on human well-being
No
Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed
No
Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment
No
Timing of the assessment
Year assessment started
Pre 2000
Year assessment finished
Ongoing
If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish
Periodicity of assessment
Repeated
If repeated, how frequently
Assessment outputs
Website(s)
Report(s)
Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)
Journal publications
Training materials
Other documents/outputs
Tools and processes
Tools and approaches used in the assessment
- Geospatial analysis
Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component
Key Biodiversity Areas are sites of global importance for biodiversity but identified at a national level by national constituencies. The KBA process should involve a wide range of stakeholders including local NGOs, government agencies, scientists and practitioners. KBAs are identified by a minimum of three steps: 1)Data compilation 2)Application of the criteria and thresholds 3)Delineation and validation of sites.
Key stakeholder groups engaged
- Local and national governmental agencies
- Local and national NGOs
- International Conservation Organizations
- Local Communities
The number of people directly involved in the assessment process
10-100
Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge
- Scientific information only
- Resource experts (e.g. foresters etc)
- Traditional/local knowledge
Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment
Assessment reports peer reviewed
No
Data
Accessibility of data used in assessment
Policy impact
Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions
Key Biodiversity Areas are key to monitor progress towards the achievement of Aichi Biodiversity Targets 11 (Protected Areas) and 12 (Prevent species extinction) as they are those sites where globally significant biodiversity is found. Not all KBAs should be Protected Areas. These sites can indeed be used to expand current protected areas coverage but also targets for the implementation of environmentally friendly schemes (i.e organic certification standards).
Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment
No
Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews
Capacity building
Capacity building needs identified during the assessment
Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity
Workshops, Communication and awareness raising