Role of ecosystem services from rainforests in well-being of Aboriginal people, Australia

Australia (Aboriginal)

Geographical coverage

Geographical scale of the assessment Sub-national
Country or countries covered Australia
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name

The assessment was carried out in northern Queensland.

Conceptual framework, methodology and scope

Assessment objectives

  1. To assess the role of ES from savanna country in well-being of Aboriginal people
  2. To assess the role of wild resources from rainforest ecosystems in well-being of Aboriginal people, North Queensland
  3. To determine the socio-economic and ecological values/costs of pigs (pests in tropical rainforests) from Aboriginal perspectives

Mandate for the assessment

Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)

URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted

See page 35 of the attached report. * The role of ecosystem services in the well-being of Aboriginal people in savanna country (2004 to 2006): a scoping study. A report submitted to CRC-TS. Others related frameworks applied in the following research projects: * Understanding the links between wild resources and Aboriginal well-being in the Wet Tropics (2006 to 2007). * Socio-economic-ecological cost of pig infestation in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Queensland (2009 to 2010).

Kamaljit, Kaur (2006). The role of ecosystem services from tropical savannas in well-being of Aboriginal people: A scoping study. A Report submitted to the TS-CRC.
CRC_report-_Final.PDF

Kamaljit Kaur (2007). Linking ecosystem services to well-being: A case study of Aboriginal communities in northern Australia. Australian Aboriginal Studies 2007/2.
Aus_Ab_Studies.pdf

Sangha, K K et al. (2011). Identifying Links between Ecosystem Services and Aboriginal Well-Being and Livelihoods in North Australia: Applying the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Framework. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 5 (2011) 931-946.
JESE_2011.pdf

System(s) assessed

  • Forest and woodland
  • Cultivated/Agricultural land
  • Grassland

Species groups assessed

Ecosystem services/functions assessed

Provisioning

  • Food
  • Water
  • Medicinal resources

Regulating

  • Air quality
  • Climate regulation
  • Regulation of water flows
  • Erosion prevention
  • Pollination

Supporting Services/Functions

  • Nutrient cycling
  • Soil formation and fertility
  • Primary production

Cultural Services

  • Recreation and tourism
  • Identity value

Scope of assessment includes

Drivers of change in systems and services

Yes

Impacts of change in services on human well-being

Yes

Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed

Yes

Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment

Yes

Timing of the assessment

Year assessment started

2010

Year assessment finished

If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish

Periodicity of assessment

One off

Assessment outputs

Website(s)

Report(s)

Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)


Application_of_the_Millennium_Assessment_Framework_in_Australian.pptx


SGA_2014__KS_Poster.pdf


SGA_presentation_Nov_2012_Final.pptx

Sangha, Kamaljit K. Application of the Millennium Assessment (MA) Framework in Australian Context. (Poster)
Australia_(Aboriginal)_Sangha_Poster.pdf

Journal publications

Sangha, K.K., Butler, J.R.A., Delisle, A., and Stanley, O. (2011) Identifying links between ecosystem services and Aboriginal well-being and livelihoods in north Australia: applying the millennium ecosystem assessment framework. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 5 (7): 931-946.
4_Sangha__K_K_et_al._(2011)..pdf

Training materials

Other documents/outputs

Tools and processes

Tools and approaches used in the assessment

  • Economic valuation
  • Social (non-monetary) valuation

Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component

Aboriginal people in north Queensland, Australia.

Key stakeholder groups engaged

Aboriginal people in north Queensland, Australia.

The number of people directly involved in the assessment process

10-100

Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge

  • Scientific information only
  • Traditional/local knowledge

Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment

Recently, I have been applying the capability approach to assess and integrate the role of ES in Indigenous well-being.

I have recently submitted this paper to a journal (will update the text, once I hear back from the editor).

Assessment reports peer reviewed

Yes

Data

Accessibility of data used in assessment

There has been interest indicated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics to improve the current socio-economic indicators of wellbeing for Indigenous people in Australia but nothing concrete yet.

Policy impact

Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions

There has been interest indicated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics to improve the current socio-economic indicators of wellbeing for Indigenous people in Australia but nothing concrete yet.

Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment

No

Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews

Scenario planning Modelling - integrating ES into well-being measures for policy decision making on Indigenous wellbeing.

Capacity building

Capacity building needs identified during the assessment

Scenario planning Modelling - integrating ES into well-being measures for policy decision making on Indigenous wellbeing.

Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity

Network and sharing experiences

How have gaps in capacity been communicated to the different stakeholders

Knowledge generation

Gaps in knowledge identified from the assessment

How gaps in knowledge have been communicated to the different stakeholders

Additional relevant information