Natural Capital Germany - TEEB DE

Natural Capital Germany

Geographical coverage

Geographical scale of the assessment National
Country or countries covered Germany
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name

Europe

Conceptual framework, methodology and scope

Assessment objectives

Mandate for the assessment

Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)

URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted

System(s) assessed

  • Marine
  • Coastal
  • Inland water
  • Forest and woodland
  • Cultivated/Agricultural land
  • Grassland
  • Mountain
  • Urban

Species groups assessed

Ecosystem services/functions assessed

Provisioning

  • Food
  • Water
  • Timber/fibres
  • Energy/fuel
  • Raw materials

Regulating

  • Air quality
  • Climate regulation
  • Moderation of extreme events
  • Regulation of water flows
  • Regulation of water quality
  • Erosion prevention
  • Pollination
  • Maintainence of soil fertility
  • Biological Control

Supporting Services/Functions

  • Habitat maintenance
  • Nutrient cycling
  • Soil formation and fertility
  • Life cycle maintenance
  • Maintenance of genetic diversity

Cultural Services

  • Recreation and tourism
  • Spiritual
  • inspiration and cognitive development
  • Aesthetic Enjoyment

Scope of assessment includes

Drivers of change in systems and services

Yes

Impacts of change in services on human well-being

Yes

Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed

Yes

Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment

No

Timing of the assessment

Year assessment started

2011

Year assessment finished

Ongoing

If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish

2015

Periodicity of assessment

Unknown

Assessment outputs

Report(s)

Naturkapital Deutschland - TEEB DE: Der Wert der Natur für Wirtschaft und Gessellschaft - Eine Einführung (in German language)
Naturkapital_TEEBDE_WertNaturWirtschaftGesellschaftEinfuehrung.pdf

Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)

Journal publications

Training materials

Other documents/outputs

Tools and processes

Tools and approaches used in the assessment

  • Trade-off analysis
  • Economic valuation
  • Social (non-monetary) valuation
  • Stakeholder consultations
  • Response options

Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component

Advisory Board Meetings Project Support Committee Meetings Interactive Forum at Project Website Public Consultation of Report Wireframes via Websurvey Kick-Off Event for each of the Reports

Key stakeholder groups engaged

Policy and Administration (in particular people from Nature Conservation, State and Regional Planning, Local and Urban Planning, Climate and Energy Policy, Water Management) Conservationists (Environmental NGOs) Business (Agriculture, Forestry, Tourism) Science

The number of people directly involved in the assessment process

100-1000

Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge

  • Resource experts (e.g. foresters etc)

Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment

Assessment reports peer reviewed

No

Data

Accessibility of data used in assessment

Policy impact

Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions

Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment

No

Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews

Capacity building

Capacity building needs identified during the assessment

Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity

Network and sharing experiences, Workshops, Communication and awareness raising

How have gaps in capacity been communicated to the different stakeholders

Knowledge generation

Gaps in knowledge identified from the assessment

How gaps in knowledge have been communicated to the different stakeholders

Additional relevant information