TEEB Netherlands: regional cases

TEEB NL

Geographical coverage

Geographical scale of the assessment Regional
Country or countries covered Netherlands
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name

Europe

Conceptual framework, methodology and scope

Assessment objectives

Mapping, quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in regional cases in The Netherlands. Analysing effects of investments, which are affecting ecosystem services, on human well-being.

Mandate for the assessment

The assessment is commissioned by the Dutch government

Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)

URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted

System(s) assessed

  • Marine
  • Inland water
  • Forest and woodland
  • Cultivated/Agricultural land

Species groups assessed

Ecosystem services/functions assessed

Provisioning

  • Food
  • Water
  • Timber/fibres

Regulating

  • Air quality
  • Climate regulation
  • Regulation of water flows
  • Regulation of water quality

Supporting Services/Functions

  • Habitat maintenance

Cultural Services

  • Recreation and tourism

Scope of assessment includes

Drivers of change in systems and services

No

Impacts of change in services on human well-being

Yes

Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed

Yes

Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment

No

Timing of the assessment

Year assessment started

2011

Year assessment finished

Ongoing

If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish

2014

Periodicity of assessment

One off

Assessment outputs

Website(s)

Report(s)

Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)

Journal publications

Training materials

Other documents/outputs

Tools and processes

Tools and approaches used in the assessment

  • Geospatial analysis
  • Indicators
  • Scenarios
  • Economic valuation

Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component

Key stakeholder groups engaged

The number of people directly involved in the assessment process

10-100

Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge

  • Resource experts (e.g. foresters etc)
  • Traditional/local knowledge

Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment

Assessment reports peer reviewed

No

Data

Accessibility of data used in assessment

Policy impact

Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions

Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment

Yes

Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews

Capacity building

Capacity building needs identified during the assessment

Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity

Network and sharing experiences, Sharing of data/repatriation of data, Workshops, Developing/promoting and providing access to support tools, Communication and awareness raising

How have gaps in capacity been communicated to the different stakeholders

Knowledge generation

Gaps in knowledge identified from the assessment

How gaps in knowledge have been communicated to the different stakeholders

Additional relevant information