Alien Species in Norway - with the Norwegian Black List 2012

Geographical coverage

Geographical scale of the assessment National
Country or countries covered Norway, Svalbard and Jan Mayen
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name

All Norwegian territories on the Northern Hemisphere, including marine.

Conceptual framework, methodology and scope

Assessment objectives

The objective is to create an overview of ecological impact assessments of alien species which reproduce in Norwegian territories. The assessments are based upon a new and semiquantitative set of criteria, where the species’ invasion potential and ecological effect are considered. The assessment includes a "Black List" of the alien species with most severe impact on Norwegian ecosystems and species.

Mandate for the assessment

Part of the national mandated given to NBIC.

Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment

Other (please specify)

The assessments are based upon a new and semiquantitative set of criteria, where the species’ invasion potential and ecological effect are considered.

URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted

Framework described in report: http://www.artsdatabanken.no/Article/Article/133437 Methods published in Biodiversity and Conservation: January 2013, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 37-62 Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-012-0394-z

System(s) assessed

  • Marine
  • Coastal
  • Inland water
  • Forest and woodland
  • Cultivated/Agricultural land
  • Grassland
  • Mountain
  • Polar

Species groups assessed

All multicellular taxonomic groups

Ecosystem services/functions assessed

Provisioning

Regulating

Supporting Services/Functions

  • Habitat maintenance

Cultural Services

Scope of assessment includes

Drivers of change in systems and services

Yes

Impacts of change in services on human well-being

No

Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed

No

Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment

Yes

Timing of the assessment

Year assessment started

2009

Year assessment finished

2012

If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish

Periodicity of assessment

Repeated

If repeated, how frequently

Planned revision every 5th year

Assessment outputs

Website(s)

http://www.artsdatabanken.no/Article/Article/133437

News article: New method for ecological risk assessments of alien species used in Norway: http://www.biodiversity.no/ArticleList.aspx?m=34&amid=12049

Report(s)

Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)

Journal publications

Training materials

Other documents/outputs

Tools and processes

Tools and approaches used in the assessment

  • Modelling
  • Geospatial analysis

Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component

Pure scientific assessment, only engagement from the scientific community

Key stakeholder groups engaged

No other

The number of people directly involved in the assessment process

10-100

Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge

  • Scientific information only

Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment

An Alien species database has been developed for all documentation, and forms a basis for a searchable web-service open for all users (Norwegian only).

Assessment reports peer reviewed

No

Data

Accessibility of data used in assessment

An Alien species database has been developed for all documentation, and forms a basis for a searchable web-service with open access(Norwegian only).

Policy impact

Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions

This assessment forms a basic knowledge platform for all national and regional policy development on alien species in Norway. In particular within the framework of the Nature Diversity Act.

Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment

No

Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews

The newly developed method proves to be a very good basis for such assessments and will be used and enhanced in next revision. Focus on lacks of data and uncertainty.

Capacity building

Capacity building needs identified during the assessment

Needs for experts covering broad taxonomic groups. Knowledge on this type of assessment methodology.

Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity

Network and sharing experiences, Sharing of data/repatriation of data, Workshops, Developing/promoting and providing access to support tools, Communication and awareness raising

How have gaps in capacity been communicated to the different stakeholders

Addressed to national authorities through meetings, seminars, news articles, etc.

Knowledge generation

Gaps in knowledge identified from the assessment

More knowledge needed on alien species and their impact in general. This includes their ecological effect and invasion potential. More systematised and international knowledge of this is also needed.

How gaps in knowledge have been communicated to the different stakeholders

Addressed to national authorities through meetings, seminars, news articles, etc.

International challenges has also been adressed through international meetings and seminars, etc.

Additional relevant information

The Norwegian experience on this field has generated a great interest in the international community dealing with knowledge and assessment of alien species.