Economic valuation of uplands ecosystem services

NECR029

Geographical coverage

Geographical scale of the assessment National
Country or countries covered United Kingdom
Any other necessary information or explanation for identifying the location of the assessment, including site or region name

England’s uplands – 6 case studies: Bleaklow, Ingleborough National Natural Reserve, X-Dale, Wild Ennerdale, SCaMP, North Pennines AONB

Conceptual framework, methodology and scope

Assessment objectives

The scope of this research was to examine the use of economic valuation techniques for valuing the ecosystem service changes due to upland management interventions and policies at a wide range of scales. The research aimed to develop a methodology and to test its applicability to a number of management changes at a range of scales. The results led to recommendations about where and how to apply economic valuation techniques for uplands ecosystem services, and point to where further research is most needed.

Mandate for the assessment

This work was commissioned as part of Natural England's Upland Futures Project, which is developing a long term vision for the upland environment in 2060.

Conceptual framework and/or methodology used for the assessment

Other (please specify)

For this research an approach and methodology were developed and tested for valuing the impacts (costs/ benefits) that a series of changes to land use and management might have on the delivery of ecosystem services and benefits.

For this research an approach and methodology were developed and tested for valuing the impacts (costs/ benefits) that a series of changes to land use and management might have on the delivery of ecosystem services and benefits.

URL or copy of conceptual framework developed or adapted

The conceptual framework is described in the report that can be downloaded from: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/48003

System(s) assessed

  • Forest and woodland
  • Cultivated/Agricultural land
  • Grassland
  • Moorland
  • Blanket bog

Species groups assessed

Ecosystem services/functions assessed

Provisioning

  • Food
  • Water
  • Timber/fibres
  • Energy/fuel

Regulating

  • Moderation of extreme events
  • Regulation of water flows
  • Regulation of water quality

Supporting Services/Functions

  • Habitat maintenance

Cultural Services

  • Recreation and tourism
  • Sense of place

Scope of assessment includes

Drivers of change in systems and services

Yes

Impacts of change in services on human well-being

Yes

Options for responding/interventions to the trends observed

Yes

Explicit consideration of the role of biodiversity in the systems and services covered by the assessment

No

Timing of the assessment

Year assessment started

2008

Year assessment finished

2009

If ongoing, year assessment is anticipated to finish

Periodicity of assessment

Assessment outputs

Report(s)

Natural England Commissioned Report NECR029 - Economic valuation of uplands ecosystem services
NECR029_edition_1.pdf

Communication materials (e.g. brochure, presentations, posters, audio-visual media)

Journal publications

Training materials

Other documents/outputs

Tools and processes

Tools and approaches used in the assessment

  • Scenarios
  • Economic valuation

Process used for stakeholder engagement in the assessment process and which component

Key stakeholder groups engaged

The number of people directly involved in the assessment process

Incorporation of scientific and other types of knowledge

  • Scientific information only

Supporting documentation for specific approaches, methodology or criteria developed and/or used to integrate knowledge systems into the assessment

Supporting documentation is listed in the report that can be downloaded from: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/48003

Assessment reports peer reviewed

Yes

Data

Accessibility of data used in assessment

The data used for the economic analysis is published in the report.

Policy impact

Impacts the assessment has had on policy and/or decision making, as evidenced through policy references and actions

Independent or other review on policy impact of the assessment

No

Lessons learnt for future assessments from these reviews

Capacity building

Capacity building needs identified during the assessment

Actions taken by the assessment to build capacity

How have gaps in capacity been communicated to the different stakeholders

Knowledge generation

Gaps in knowledge identified from the assessment

To a greater or lesser extent, there are uncertainties – physical, ecological and/or economic - in all the ecosystem services examined. In particular, more work is needed looking at underlying soils and how this influences services. To some extent this work exists, but interpretations of habitats in this report do not reflect the full range of information available.

How gaps in knowledge have been communicated to the different stakeholders

Additional relevant information